<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Slow Burn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.janehaddam.com/2010/01/20/the-slow-burn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2010/01/20/the-slow-burn/</link>
	<description>Jane Haddam’s WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAFiorello</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2010/01/20/the-slow-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>CAFiorello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=1282#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d never put up with that! Out you go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d never put up with that! Out you go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2010/01/20/the-slow-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>jd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=1282#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>I agree with Lymaree and Mique. Leave!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lymaree and Mique. Leave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mique</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2010/01/20/the-slow-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>Mique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=1282#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>Begone!  Don&#039;t even look back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Begone!  Don&#8217;t even look back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lymaree</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2010/01/20/the-slow-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>Lymaree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=1282#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>Studies have shown that those who feel they have the most control over their working environment have the highest job satisfaction, regardless of other factors, including what the job is. 

As they nibble away at your control over your working day, and marginalize you and the other adjuncts more and more, your job satisfaction cannot possibly improve. Time to move on. Really. You&#039;re not in it for the money, which makes salary negotiations really easy. You want students you can actually benefit and a place that affords you a modicum of respect for the job you do and the credentials you&#039;ve earned. 

These administration drones (pity them in their inadequacy) will eventually reap the rewards of their mismanagement when the graduates enter the work force, even more pitifully unprepared for real life because they&#039;ll have been rewarded simply for showing up by the dregs they&#039;ll get to replace you. That word gets around in the work world, believe me, that hiring a graduate of Your School is the kiss of death, and given the situation now where employers with an actual job have their choice of many experienced and/or properly educated applicants, the worm will turn around and erupt right under their feet.

Wow. What a tortured metaphor. The point being that under-served graduates will demand their money back, or some other satisfaction. 

Leave them to stew in their own juice. In your exit letter or interview, make it plain why you&#039;re leaving. Name names. They won&#039;t care, but it ought to make you feel better. When they&#039;re scraping the bottom of the barrel to try to keep the fourth or fifth adjust from quitting after taking your classes, perhaps they&#039;ll take another look at the Administrators From Hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studies have shown that those who feel they have the most control over their working environment have the highest job satisfaction, regardless of other factors, including what the job is. </p>
<p>As they nibble away at your control over your working day, and marginalize you and the other adjuncts more and more, your job satisfaction cannot possibly improve. Time to move on. Really. You&#8217;re not in it for the money, which makes salary negotiations really easy. You want students you can actually benefit and a place that affords you a modicum of respect for the job you do and the credentials you&#8217;ve earned. </p>
<p>These administration drones (pity them in their inadequacy) will eventually reap the rewards of their mismanagement when the graduates enter the work force, even more pitifully unprepared for real life because they&#8217;ll have been rewarded simply for showing up by the dregs they&#8217;ll get to replace you. That word gets around in the work world, believe me, that hiring a graduate of Your School is the kiss of death, and given the situation now where employers with an actual job have their choice of many experienced and/or properly educated applicants, the worm will turn around and erupt right under their feet.</p>
<p>Wow. What a tortured metaphor. The point being that under-served graduates will demand their money back, or some other satisfaction. </p>
<p>Leave them to stew in their own juice. In your exit letter or interview, make it plain why you&#8217;re leaving. Name names. They won&#8217;t care, but it ought to make you feel better. When they&#8217;re scraping the bottom of the barrel to try to keep the fourth or fifth adjust from quitting after taking your classes, perhaps they&#8217;ll take another look at the Administrators From Hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert_piepenbrink</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2010/01/20/the-slow-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>robert_piepenbrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=1282#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>One sees the bureaucratic beauty of the thing. They&#039;re not paying you: they&#039;re paying the full-time faculty in enhanced prestige BY not paying you. The more petty restrictions and costs they force on adjuncts, the higher the (relative) prestige of the full-timers.

Yes, of course they&#039;ll lose adjuncts--but maybe not so many as you think. If this is the lowest-paying college teaching gig in the area, the adjuncts either can&#039;t get into the others or--like you--aren&#039;t primarily in it for the money. You want &quot;to be of use to the students,&quot; and their objective is to pay you as much in satisfying that desire and a little in money and faculty prestige as they can get away with. For that matter, replacing you with someone less capable won&#039;t bother them unless and until the loss of capability gets so obvious it affects enrollment.

Incidentally, it&#039;s not the &quot;for profit&quot; that causes the problem. Plenty of government agencies and charities are just as bad. The problem is we&#039;ve set up a system in which they can sell diplomas rather than training or education. At that point, any teacher better than the worst they can hire and maintain accreditation is a waste.

It&#039;s an administrator&#039;s way of thinking. And I&#039;m sure the fact that many of them enjoy the pettiness and form-filling is part of their compensation package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One sees the bureaucratic beauty of the thing. They&#8217;re not paying you: they&#8217;re paying the full-time faculty in enhanced prestige BY not paying you. The more petty restrictions and costs they force on adjuncts, the higher the (relative) prestige of the full-timers.</p>
<p>Yes, of course they&#8217;ll lose adjuncts&#8211;but maybe not so many as you think. If this is the lowest-paying college teaching gig in the area, the adjuncts either can&#8217;t get into the others or&#8211;like you&#8211;aren&#8217;t primarily in it for the money. You want &#8220;to be of use to the students,&#8221; and their objective is to pay you as much in satisfying that desire and a little in money and faculty prestige as they can get away with. For that matter, replacing you with someone less capable won&#8217;t bother them unless and until the loss of capability gets so obvious it affects enrollment.</p>
<p>Incidentally, it&#8217;s not the &#8220;for profit&#8221; that causes the problem. Plenty of government agencies and charities are just as bad. The problem is we&#8217;ve set up a system in which they can sell diplomas rather than training or education. At that point, any teacher better than the worst they can hire and maintain accreditation is a waste.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an administrator&#8217;s way of thinking. And I&#8217;m sure the fact that many of them enjoy the pettiness and form-filling is part of their compensation package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2010/01/20/the-slow-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=1282#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>What a mess! It almost sounds like they&#039;re trying to force the adjuncts to quit, but where&#039;s the point in that if they&#039;re so big a part of the workforce? Or it could be simple idiocy - that should never be underestimated. It might be some manager in some office somewhere who hasn&#039;t the faintest idea of how to run a college and still insists on doing things his or her way. Education-as-a-business does seem to require cutting costs and money spent on basic resources plus guaranteed graduation and jobs, but they do need somebody to teach, or at least spend time in the classroom. The local equivalents mostly didn&#039;t last long - I think education for profit is very difficult unless you limit it in some way - concentrate on tutoring reading skills or something. One of the veterans of a private school (post-secondary) bankruptcy here supposedly ended up in Florida advising people on how to make money running such a place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a mess! It almost sounds like they&#8217;re trying to force the adjuncts to quit, but where&#8217;s the point in that if they&#8217;re so big a part of the workforce? Or it could be simple idiocy &#8211; that should never be underestimated. It might be some manager in some office somewhere who hasn&#8217;t the faintest idea of how to run a college and still insists on doing things his or her way. Education-as-a-business does seem to require cutting costs and money spent on basic resources plus guaranteed graduation and jobs, but they do need somebody to teach, or at least spend time in the classroom. The local equivalents mostly didn&#8217;t last long &#8211; I think education for profit is very difficult unless you limit it in some way &#8211; concentrate on tutoring reading skills or something. One of the veterans of a private school (post-secondary) bankruptcy here supposedly ended up in Florida advising people on how to make money running such a place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

