<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tragedies of Manners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.janehaddam.com/2009/07/25/tragedies-of-manners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2009/07/25/tragedies-of-manners/</link>
	<description>Jane Haddam’s WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert_piepenbrink</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2009/07/25/tragedies-of-manners/comment-page-1/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>robert_piepenbrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=689#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>I think we just changed ossified systems. The breakdown and the new system are still on the agenda, and one hears ominous noises now and then. Of course I tend to see Bohemianism as an equally formal system with a different set of rules. Yes, it may have been intended as something else, but that happens.

And I think we switched criteria somewhere. Yesterday&#039;s great writers were people of keen analytical insight who saw to the heart of the human condition. And how keen that insight is depends a lot on what one thinks the human condition is.
Today&#039;s great writers seem to be great stylists, which is by no means the same thing. I will happily concede that one may be a great stylist and in all other respects a blithering idiot.

Music for style above all else, writing for story and ideas. Painting and sculpture somewhere in between.

Or the Philistine motto (all together now): &quot;A tune you can whistle, a story with a plot, and a picture that looks like the little brass plaque.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we just changed ossified systems. The breakdown and the new system are still on the agenda, and one hears ominous noises now and then. Of course I tend to see Bohemianism as an equally formal system with a different set of rules. Yes, it may have been intended as something else, but that happens.</p>
<p>And I think we switched criteria somewhere. Yesterday&#8217;s great writers were people of keen analytical insight who saw to the heart of the human condition. And how keen that insight is depends a lot on what one thinks the human condition is.<br />
Today&#8217;s great writers seem to be great stylists, which is by no means the same thing. I will happily concede that one may be a great stylist and in all other respects a blithering idiot.</p>
<p>Music for style above all else, writing for story and ideas. Painting and sculpture somewhere in between.</p>
<p>Or the Philistine motto (all together now): &#8220;A tune you can whistle, a story with a plot, and a picture that looks like the little brass plaque.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

