<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Nothing You Want Is Still in Print&#8230;and Other Things.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.janehaddam.com/2009/04/21/why-nothing-you-want-is-still-in-printand-other-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2009/04/21/why-nothing-you-want-is-still-in-printand-other-things/</link>
	<description>Jane Haddam’s WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert_piepenbrink</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2009/04/21/why-nothing-you-want-is-still-in-printand-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>robert_piepenbrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=479#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Silly me: I thought Homer and Shakespeare WERE fiction.  And not introducing the kids to novels or short stories might very well work better than driving them through the present selections. (Remember HARVEY? &quot;I never knew anyone by that name. I suppose that&#039;s why I had such high expectations.&quot;)

My affection for continued novels is limited. I was merely suggesting things publishers might do to stop driving away customers--such as telling a complete story within the lifetime of the reader. The things I&#039;d like them to do as a reader would be a different list.

Actually, except for two serious works of military history, every book I want is readily available--either in print, POD, or quickly here in a good used copy. (In some cases the age of the paper is a problem.) I have a lot more trouble with movies and TV where some of what I&#039;m after has never been released on DVD. Even there I&#039;ve whittled it down to about three movies and maybe six program/seasons&#039;s worth of TV. I tell my son about the wonders of buying a book with the Single Copy Order Plan in the 1960&#039;s, or running ads in THE ANITQUARIAN BOOKMAN for used books in the 1970&#039;s and I&#039;m not sure he altogether believes me. For the reader, today is infinitely better. 
I too would like to think any good mystery should have 10,000 people willing to pay $30 each for a proper hardcover. Either there really aren&#039;t, in which case I think the education system has to take some of the blame, or there really are, but they&#039;re not hearing about the books. Any suggestions for that one?

I stand corrected on copyeditor as opposed to proofreader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly me: I thought Homer and Shakespeare WERE fiction.  And not introducing the kids to novels or short stories might very well work better than driving them through the present selections. (Remember HARVEY? &#8220;I never knew anyone by that name. I suppose that&#8217;s why I had such high expectations.&#8221;)</p>
<p>My affection for continued novels is limited. I was merely suggesting things publishers might do to stop driving away customers&#8211;such as telling a complete story within the lifetime of the reader. The things I&#8217;d like them to do as a reader would be a different list.</p>
<p>Actually, except for two serious works of military history, every book I want is readily available&#8211;either in print, POD, or quickly here in a good used copy. (In some cases the age of the paper is a problem.) I have a lot more trouble with movies and TV where some of what I&#8217;m after has never been released on DVD. Even there I&#8217;ve whittled it down to about three movies and maybe six program/seasons&#8217;s worth of TV. I tell my son about the wonders of buying a book with the Single Copy Order Plan in the 1960&#8242;s, or running ads in THE ANITQUARIAN BOOKMAN for used books in the 1970&#8242;s and I&#8217;m not sure he altogether believes me. For the reader, today is infinitely better.<br />
I too would like to think any good mystery should have 10,000 people willing to pay $30 each for a proper hardcover. Either there really aren&#8217;t, in which case I think the education system has to take some of the blame, or there really are, but they&#8217;re not hearing about the books. Any suggestions for that one?</p>
<p>I stand corrected on copyeditor as opposed to proofreader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lymaree</title>
		<link>http://blog.janehaddam.com/2009/04/21/why-nothing-you-want-is-still-in-printand-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Lymaree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.janehaddam.com/?p=479#comment-731</guid>
		<description>And how much time did your Dad spend on the internet? Or watching TV?

I suspect a lot more people would read if they didn&#039;t have those resources/time sinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how much time did your Dad spend on the internet? Or watching TV?</p>
<p>I suspect a lot more people would read if they didn&#8217;t have those resources/time sinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

